Legal Opinion

Gerwitz v. Brogan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in ordering plaintiff to reimburse defendant for improvements made by defendant to plaintiff’s property, in the absence of a request by defendant for such reimbursement or any other equitable relief (cf., Kraker v Roll, 100 AD2d 424, 433; Roller v Frankel, 9 AD2d 24, appeal dismissed 9 NY2d 649). We, therefore, modify the judgment on appeal by vacating that portion awarding defendant $49,600 for the improvements. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kraker v. RollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Roller v. FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API