Legal Opinion

Killgore v. Zinkhan

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 6, 1921No. 3414PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Proceeding by M. Alice Zinkhan, as landlord, against Emma Kill-gore, as tenant. Judgment for the landlord, and the tenant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

This is a landlord and tenant case. Zink-han brought action in the municipal court against Killgore to recover possession of certain real estate. Objection having been made to the court’s proceeding until the rent commission, provided for under the Act of October 22, 1919 (41 Stat. 298), known as the “Ball Act,” had passed upon the question as to whether Zinkhan was entitled to possession, the case was continued to await the commission’s determination. The commission ruled in favor of Zinkhan, and from its action no appeal was taken. Afterwards the case was called for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. National CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Spring Valley Water Works v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCoy v. DuehayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  2. Smith v. PyneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
  3. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Davis v. CookseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
  5. Athan v. National Savings & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API