Legal Opinion · Dissent

Area Real Estate Associates, Inc. v. City of Raymore

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1985No. WD 36071Published

1DissentPritchard, Presiding Judge

The majority opinion purports to hold as a matter of law that the City had no easement right to construct an additional line to the Boneless Beef property [as a defense to plaintiff’s claim for damages in Count III of its petition in the nature of inverse condemnation occasioned by defendant city’s entry upon, installation and construction of a sewer line in and over a portion of plaintiff’s property, done without permission as alleged]. In this holding, I am convinced, the majority opinion errs, and I therefore dissent. Upon the issues submitted on plaintiff’s claim, and the grant of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bolomey v. HouchinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Van Dyke v. Major Tractor & Equipment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Keener v. Black River Electric Co-OperativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Keener v. Black River Electric Co-operativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. State Ex Rel. Hill-House v. Hunter Raffety Elevator, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API