Legal Opinion

People v. Tillman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion of defendant seeking suppression of tangible evidence seized by police officers from his person and the automobile in which he was a passenger. Because the People did not charge defendant with criminal possession of a weapon based on the statutory presumption in Penal Law § 265.15 (3), defendant did not have automatic standing to challenge the search of the automobile (see, People v Wesley, 73 NY2d 351, 361; People v Reynolds, 216 AD2d 883, lv denied 86 NY2d 801). Nor did defendant have standing to challenge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. People v. DillardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HowardAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API