People v. Tillman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion of defendant seeking suppression of tangible evidence seized by police officers from his person and the automobile in which he was a passenger. Because the People did not charge defendant with criminal possession of a weapon based on the statutory presumption in Penal Law § 265.15 (3), defendant did not have automatic standing to challenge the search of the automobile (see, People v Wesley, 73 NY2d 351, 361; People v Reynolds, 216 AD2d 883, lv denied 86 NY2d 801). Nor did defendant have standing to challenge…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. DillardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. HowardAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011