Legal Opinion

Wallace v. D. H. Scott & Son

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1939No. 6978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge German

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This suit was instituted by the plaintiff in error, R H. Wallace, against D. H. Scott & Son, and T. M. Scott, and the Rutland Savings Bank of Vermont, seeking to have a certain promissory note for the principal sum of $6000, hereinafter described, declared usurious, and to have the principal thereof extinguished by the application of various payments of usurious interest. The Rutland Savings Bank, which will be hereinafter called the Rutland Bank, alleged in its answer, among other things, that it was holder of said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Nevels v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Commerce Trust Co. v. BestTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hamilton v. BillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commerce Trust Co. v. RampTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
  2. General American Life Insurance v. RampTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Southwestern Investment Co. v. Hockley County Seed & Delinting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Robertson v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Robertson v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API