Legal Opinion

State v. Kaub

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction, E. A. Noonan,. Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, J.

Two questions only are presented for our consideration, arising upon this record. First, whether the information, filed, states a sufficient cause of action against the defendant; and, second, whether an information, verified only according to the best knowledge and information of the affiant, is constitutionally valid.

' Upon an information, which charges the defendant with the “ wrongful and unlawful sale of a certain share or shares, in certain lottery tickets, in a certain lottery and device in the nature of a lottery, known as the Louisiana State Lottery,” etc., he was tried, found…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FitzporterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. State v. McWilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DowningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Ex parte OldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. McCormick v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. State v. KaubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. State ex rel. Sexton v. TittmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API