Koeppen v. Bolich
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Appellants Jon Bolich and Janlee Ruff, hereinafter referred to interchangeably as Bolich and Ruff or Appellants, appeal from the findings of fact, conclusions of law, order, and final judgment and injunction entered in the District Court for the Twenty-First Judicial District, Ravalli County, in favor of the Respondents, Donald B. Koeppen and Grace E. Koeppen (Koeppens). Appellants contend the District Court’s findings are clearly erroneous and its conclusions are incorrect as a matter of law. The findings determined, inter alia, that the terminus of Appellants’ relocated easement on land…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Guthrie v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Laden v. AtkesonMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Rafanelli v. DaleMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Double AA Corp. v. Newland & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
- M.H. Ex Rel. M.H. v. Montana High School Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anderson v. StokesMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Rossi v. PawiroredjoMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re the Marriage of GrendeMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Weer v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Teton Cooperative Reservoir Co. v. Farmers Cooperative Canal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.