Legal Opinion

People v. Castillo

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Roger S. Hayes, J.

Defendant was indicted for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree. Defendant moved to sup*238press cocaine recovered from his shopping bag as well as his statements to the police. The court conducted a Mapp/Huntley hearing. Based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law stated below, defendant’s motions to suppress are denied.

Findings of Fact

The People presented a single witness, Police Officer George Hellmer. Defendant did not present any witnesses. The court finds that Officer Hellmer testified openly, did not attempt to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API