Fish v. Vanderlip
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Frank A. Vanderlip, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Mew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 28th day of July, 1915, sustaining a demurrer to the fifth separate defense set up in the amended answer.
1Dissent
Laughlin, J. (dissenting):
The plaintiff alleges that the defendant and ninety-nine other firms and individuals as separate underwriters, doing business together under the name and style of “At United States ' Lloyds ’” of Hew York city, through their attorneys, Higgins & Cox, issued and delivered to the plaintiff their certain policy of insurance in writing, a copy of which is annexed to the complaint and made a part thereof, insuring plaintiff’s auxiliary schooner yacht Senta, among other things, against loss or damage by fire for the term of one year from the 15th day of April, 1910, in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashton v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Fulton County Gas & Electric Co. v. Hudson River Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Moore v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Mitchell v. First Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Rumford Chemical Works v. Hygienic Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.