Smack v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHornby, J.
Pursuant to Code (1957), Art. 66C, § 708(a)—wherein it is provided that land beneath the waters of the State may be leased for the purpose, among others, of cultivating oysters or shell fish—the appellant sought to lease an area in Chincoteague (on Sinepuxent) Bay for the cultivation of oysters. The appellees, protesting the issuance of the lease, brought this action contending that the area in question was a natural clam bar and therefore not leaseable under § 708(b).
Article 66C of the Code (1964 Cum. Supp.), § 708(c), provides that natural oyster or clam bars shall be construed to mean and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dunnill v. BloombergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Garozynski v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Popham v. Conservation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Lenehan v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Old Colony Insurance v. MoskiosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Plitt v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Yommer v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Cavalier Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Liberty Homes, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- JACOBSON, T/A CHECKER CAB ASSOCIATION, INC. v. JulianCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.