Legal Opinion
324 Liquor Corp. v. McLaughlin
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur E. Blyn, J.
In this article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks to review and annul respondents’ determination which after a hearing found it guilty of advertising and selling liquor at a price below the minimum retail price allowed by law and suspended its license for 10 days and ordered its compliance bond forfeited.
At the hearing petitioner stipulated that it had advertised and sold the liquor as charged in respondents’ specifications, but contended that the minimum resale prices relied upon by the State Liquor Authority were illegal. The trier of fact sustained the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- MTR OF HERZOG v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Serlin Wine & Spirit Merchants, Inc. v. HealyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
- Mancini v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- 324 Liquor Corp. v. DuffySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- 324 Liquor Corp. v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- 324 Liquor Corp. v. DuffySupreme Court of the United States · 1987