Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1980No. 119PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant maintains that it was error to permit Baker to testify over objection as to a prior statement made to him by Geraldine King when the prior statement impeached material portions of her testimony. Defendant further argues that the trial judge erred in ruling that Glenda Joy Moore was a hostile witness and that the State could impeach her when the State was not misled, surprised or entrapped by her testimony when it was well aware prior to calling her that she intended to deny making certain statements to Officer Reams. We agree with defendant’s position on both…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. RedfernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API