Hale-Berry Co. v. Diamond State Iron Co.

Lumpkin, Justice.

1. The decision of this court in National Bank of Augusta v. Richmond Factory et al., decided at the last term, 91 Ga. 284, 18 S. E. Rep. 160, supports the ruling announced in the first head-note.

2. The object of the petition filed against the Hale-Berry Company being to have a receiver appointed to take charge of all the assets of this corporation, there *63was no indispensable necessity for alleging of what the assets consisted, or for describing them in detail. The equity of the petition was complete without such description. It would have been better, however, to state…