Legal Opinion · Dissent

Detroit City Council v. Stecher

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1988No. 79368, (Calendar No. 3)Published

1DissentGriffin, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the city council may only accept or reject recommendations submitted by the mayor for dealing with an impending deficit in the general budget. I would hold that the council has the authority and responsibility to amend such recommendations as it deems necessary, subject to the authority of the mayor to veto any such amendment.

*91Section 17 of the Uniform Budgeting and Accounting Act (ubaa) specifically places an affirmative duty upon the city council as the legislative body to correct impending deficit situations:

The legislative body of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marks v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Detroit City Council v. StecherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API