Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw the plea on that ground (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726 [1995]; People v Carr, 89 AD3d 1033 [2011]). In any event, the defendant’s plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16 [1983]; People v Jones, 183 AD2d 918 [1992]). Angiolillo, J.P, Dickerson, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. ToxeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. CarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. PelaezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. PelaezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012