Legal Opinion

Watson v. Suggs

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 4, 1993No. 2079PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves the disputed ownership of a tract of land. Respondent, Watson, sought to prove that he owned the disputed tract of land and the Suggses, through their agent, trespassed and removed timber from this land. The Suggses claimed they owned the land. After the evidence was presented, the Suggses moved for a directed verdict which was denied. The jury found in favor of Watson, and the Suggses moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or in the alternative for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion. We reverse and remand.

The Suggses argue that this case is an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haithcock v. HaithcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Bell v. Harrington Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. Corley v. LooperCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Cummings v. VarnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Brown v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bodiford v. Spanish Oaks Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Millvale Plantation, LLC v. Carrison Family Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API