Legal Opinion

In re Reilly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 10, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Having granted petitioner’s motion for an order declaring that the pleadings raised no factual issues and having considered respondent’s submissions in mitigation, we now find respondent guilty of the following professional misconduct as charged and specified in the petition. Respondent converted funds he received on behalf of two clients, commingled personal funds with funds of his clients, failed to maintain funds in an IOLA account or an interest bearing account for the benefit of his clients or third parties, failed to promptly remit client property, failed to maintain complete records of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re KoplovitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re DiMaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API