Legal Opinion

Lane v. Lane

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1958Published

1Opinion of the CourtFrederick Backer, J.

On this motion for reargument, the court has reviewed the original papers on the motion heretofore decided and, further, has examined the original papers on file in the motions decided by Justices Gold and Lynch. Upon the additional facts now before the court, the application will be regarded as a motion for leave to renew and reconsider, which is granted, rather than for reargument, which is limited only to the original papers (Sheer v. Long Is. R. R. Co., 282 App. Div. 724; Matter of Rand, 273 App. Div. 859; Gold v. Travelers Ins. Co., 263 App. Div. 817). Upon such renewal and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scheer v. Long Island Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. Gold v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Merchants Sales Co. v. Suzanne Processed Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API