Legal Opinion

Collins v. Stynchcombe

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1970No. 26044PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Justice.

A court in the asylum State has three issues before it in examining any extradition by way of habeas corpus: (1) whether a crime has been properly charged in the demanding State; (2) whether the fugitive in custody is the person so charged; and (3) whether the fugitive was in the demanding State at the time the crime alleged was committed. Johnson v. Matthews, 182 F2d 677, 679, cert. denied 340 U. S. 828; Sweeney v. Woodall, 344 U. S. 86 (73 SC 139, 97 LE 114); Tucker v. Donovan, 321 F2d 114; Woods v. Cronvich, 396 F2d 143 (5th Cir., 1968). It is fundamental' to our Federal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sweeney v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  2. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Smithwick v. OlsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Smith v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API