Legal Opinion

Geary v. Saul

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 23, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01167Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 GUILLERMO G., Case No.: 20-cv-01167-JLB 14 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING AMENDED 15 v. JOINT MOTION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY 16 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL Commissioner of Social Security, 17 ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 Defendant. U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS 18 PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1920

19 [ECF No. 16] 20 21 22 Before the Court is an amended joint motion for an order awarding Plaintiff 23 $2,100.00 in attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Sogomon Akopyan v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Costa v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Jeffrey Meier v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API