Legal Opinion
Klock v. Pierson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 21, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The finding, with such corrections as the evidence, received at the trial, justifies, discloses the following facts: Ada C. Howes, the plaintiff’s intestate, was the aunt by marriage of the defendant Edna Pierson and held the latter in her affectionate esteem. Mrs. Howes lived in Brewster, New York, and Mrs. Pierson in Danbury. In May, 1931, Mrs. Howes sent for her niece, told her her uncle’s estate had been settled and that she would like to give her some of the money so that she could build a home of her own. As a result of other visits, Mrs. Howes, on September 15th, 1931, went with Mrs.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. . DotterweichNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Reynolds v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- McFarland v. SikesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
- Niblock v. . SpragueNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Couch v. MeekerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1817
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Linahan v. LinahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Kukanskis v. JasutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Mortgage Buyers of America v. Wolfman, No. 519778 (Jan. 28, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994