Provo City v. Jacobsen
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WADE, Justice.
In plaintiff’s petition for rehearing they urge that this court erred in assuming that the lands east of the old shore line, which the trial court found runs on the west side of the lands claimed by the defendants from the old Provo Resort to Will Peay’s cabin, are all higher than that shore line, whereas the evidence establishes that this is not the case. We have rechecked the evidence and find that this contention is correct and some changes will therefore have to be made in our previous decision.
The three justices who concurred in the original prevailing opinion are now all…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Utah Ex Rel. Div. of Foresty, Fire & State v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon)California Supreme Court · 1981
- Utah Ex Rel. Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2004
- Farrer v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Provo City v. JACOBSENUtah Supreme Court · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.