Legal Opinion

People v. Montour

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 23, 2007No. 02SA365PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

I. Introduction

In this appeal, we exercise our jurisdiction to conduct an independent review of the death sentence of Edward Montour, Jr. We hold that Colorado's death penalty statute cannot deprive the defendant of his Sixth Amendment jury trial right on the facts essential to the death penalty eligibility determination when that defendant pleads guilty. Here, Montour pled guilty and pursuant to the Colorado death penalty statute, his guilty plea automatically waived his right to have a jury determine his sentence. We hold that the statute unconstitutionally links the waiver of a defendant's…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Qwest Services Corp. v. BloodSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. Juhl v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  3. Dallman v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  4. Sperry v. FieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  5. People v. Tate Banks v. People Jensen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API