Carlyon v. Fitzhenry
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a Judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPorter, J.
Defendants were- partners in the general grocery business. The defendant Fitzhenry, in the absence and without the knowledge of defendant Mansfield, received from the plaintiff $400 in gold coin, and at his request, and for his accommodation, put the money in the firm’s safe for safekeeping. Mansfield knew nothing about the transaction until after the loss of the money. The plaintiff and Fitzhenry being together in defendants’ store, in the absence of Mansfield, Fitzhenry told the plaintiff “that the defendants might be short of cash for freight, and asked him if they might use one hundred or…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Colburn v. Washington State Art Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- O'Keefe v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Gerrish v. Muskegon Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1904