Legal Opinion

Tyson v. Aikman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 11, 1947PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice:

The appellant, Tyson, as plaintiff brought her bill to foreclose and enforce a contract for sale of real property entered into by her as vendor with the appellees, Aikmans, as purchasers. Defendant answered and at the final hearing upon the bill answer and testimony the Chancellor dismissed the bill.

The vendor promised that upon the payment of the purchase price, that she-would at that time “issue to the second parties, their heirs or assigns, a good and sufficient warranty deed free from all incumbrance to the above property.” The time for payment according to the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bruno v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Lendsay v. CottonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Thornber v. City of Fort Walton BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners v. Public Employees Relations CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. In Re Knight's EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API