Legal Opinion

State v. Rison

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 22, 2003No. 20983-1-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

An apartment tenant has authority to consent to a search of his apartment. State v. Mathe, 102 Wn.2d 537, 540-41, 688 P.2d 859 (1984). He has no authority, however, to consent to a search of another’s property. See, e.g., State v. Holmes, 108 Wn. App. 511, 518-19, 31 P.3d *958716 (2001). Here, the tenant consented to a police search of his apartment. While doing so, the police also searched a guest’s eyeglass case. The guest, Aaron Rison, did not authorize that search. We therefore reverse the trial judge’s order denying Mr. Rison’s motion to suppress the drugs found in the glasses case, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. State v. RisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. State Of Washington v. Marco Gerardo MezaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State Of Washington, V. Bradley R. GibersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  5. State Of Washington, V. Jerome Isaiah GarnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API