B.B. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
We withdraw the previous decision in this case, a per curiam affirmed without written opinion, and substitute the following, at the request of appellant.
We affirm B.B.’s conviction for escape from a restrictiveness level VI juvenile residential commitment facility because the date of B.B.’s commitment was subsequent to October 1, 1990. See B.H. v. State, 622 So.2d 615 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). See also R.W. v. State, 623 So.2d 868 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); B.M. v. State, 625 So.2d 956 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); D.F. v. State, 623 So.2d 867 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH, COBB and…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- B.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- B.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- D.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- R.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
4Cited by1 opinion
- B.B. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994