Legal Opinion

West v. Holman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 22, 1933No. 7 Div. 188PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This case was here on a former, appeal. The report of that appeal appears in West v. Holman et al., 223 Ala. 114, 134 So. 667, in which will be found a general statement of the case.

The parties seem to have treated the refiling of the original bill by the “complainant,” .after demurrers filed by the. several respondents were sustained to the bill as amended, as having the effect of eliminating all of the parties respondent brought in by the amended bill, and the case was so treated by this court on the first appeal. The Todd-Worsham Auction Company, a partnership composed of C.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kinney v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Alabama City G. & A. Ry. Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Reese v. BarkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. West v. HolmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Company v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Federal Land Bank v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API