Legal Opinion

Fox v. Cusick

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1975No. 7274PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This action was commenced by Edward and Phenamaye Cusick to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Their car was struck in the rear by a car driven by the defendant, Gary Fox. A jury returned its verdict for Fox. The Cu.sicks timely moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial. The district court denied their motion for judgment n.o.v. but granted a new trial because of its belief that the verdict was. against the weight of the evidence. This appeal by Fox challenges that ruling.

Rul…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Price v. SinnottNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Barreth v. Reno Bus Lines, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Amundsen v. Ohio Brass Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Sierra Pacific Power Company v. DayNevada Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Grosjean v. Imperial Palace, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Taylor v. SilvaNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v. RothNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Weaver Bros., Ltd. v. MisskelleyNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Brascia v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API