Legal Opinion

Carstedt v. Grindeland

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1985No. C5-84-1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Howard Carstedt appeals from an order denying his motion to hold Gordon Grinde-land, Steven Grindeland, and their respective corporations in contempt for failure to comply with a prior court order. We affirm.

FACTS

In June 1973 Howard Carstedt, a machinist, and Gordon Grindeland, the owner of a company called Clean Print Systems, Inc. (CPS), executed a licensing agreement. The agreement granted Grindeland the exclusive right to manufacture and sell an invention of Carstedt’s called an automatic sheet decurler, which is installed on printing presses to keep the edges of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mr. Steak, Inc. v. Sandquist Steaks, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Carstedt v. GrindelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fritz v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API