Carstedt v. Grindeland
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Howard Carstedt appeals from an order denying his motion to hold Gordon Grinde-land, Steven Grindeland, and their respective corporations in contempt for failure to comply with a prior court order. We affirm.
FACTS
In June 1973 Howard Carstedt, a machinist, and Gordon Grindeland, the owner of a company called Clean Print Systems, Inc. (CPS), executed a licensing agreement. The agreement granted Grindeland the exclusive right to manufacture and sell an invention of Carstedt’s called an automatic sheet decurler, which is installed on printing presses to keep the edges of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mr. Steak, Inc. v. Sandquist Steaks, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Carstedt v. GrindelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fritz v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985