Legal Opinion
McGill v. Ryals
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 17, 1966No. 381 MPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Per curiam
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the case was not appropriate for a three-judge court.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that a three-judge court was properly convened and would affirm the judgment of the lower court.
2Cited by42 opinions
- Hodges v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Kenneth Wayne Nelson v. Charles K. Miller, Captain, United States Navy, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Mary Fishe Bell v. J. W. SouthwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Robert T. Mathis, Sr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Albert C. Toney v. N. A. White, United States of America v. Myrtis BishopCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.