Legal Opinion

Sampson v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 3, 1949Published

1Opinion of the Court

Exceptions overruled. The plaintiff, a passenger who was hurt alighting from a bus of the Boston Elevated Railway Company, brings this action of tort. The defendant was substituted as party defendant. St. 1947, c. 544, § 20. *758The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff following the denial of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. There was no error. There was evidence that the bus had stopped close to the curbstone in response to the plaintiff’s ringing the signal bell; that the operator opened the doors for her to leave; and that while both her feet were on the lower step and just…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gray v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Pelland v. D'AllesandroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Killam v. Wellesley & Boston Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. McDermott v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Weil v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API