Hanisky v. Kennedy
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Fillmore county. Tried below before Morris, J. cited : Cottrell v. State, 9 Neb., 127; Jones v. State, 14 Id., 210; Hinton v. Dickinson, 19 O. St., 583; Meredith v. Wall, 14 Allen [Mass.], 155; Smith v. Lmt, 37 Me., 546; Maxwell v. Campbell, 8 O. St., 265; Hauskinsv.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Fillmore county. Tried below before Morris, J. cited : Cottrell v. State, 9 Neb., 127; Jones v. State, 14 Id., 210; Hinton v. Dickinson, 19 O. St., 583; Meredith v. Wall, 14 Allen [Mass.], 155; Smith v. Lmt, 37 Me., 546; Maxwell v. Campbell, 8 O. St., 265; Hauskinsv. People, 82 111., 193; Evans v. State, 58 Ind., 587; Jardee v. State, 36 Wis., 170; State v. Zeitler, 35 Minn., 238; Scattenvhite v. State, 32 Ala., 578. cited: State v. Beatty, 16 N. W. Rep. [Ia.], 149.
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
On the 15th day of May, 1889, Emma Hanisky filed a complaint before the county judge of Fillmore county, alleging she was a single woman and pregnant of a bastard child, and that M. C. Kennedy was the father of such child. Such proceedings were had that Kennedy was held to answer said complaint at the next term of the district court of said county. This court convened in November of that year, and it being made to appear to the court that the child was born on the 22d day of September and had died on the 26th day of October following, the district court, on motion of the defendant…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bolich v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Harshman v. IngwersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. WiegandNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. GrunlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1915