Legal Opinion

Sloin v. Lavine

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant Miss Levine and plaintiff were engaged to marry. He gave her an engagement ring and certain other presents of minor value. They quarreled, the engagement was broken off, and he brought replevin for what he had given her. The court awarded her the other presents and him the ring, and she appeals. The grounds of appeal are: (1) refusal to nonsuit; (2) awarding ring to plaintiff instead of to defendant.

The motion to nonsuit was on two grounds:(a) That the evidence failed to show the plaintiff’s right to possession of the property.(b) That the evidence showed the gifts were absolute.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beck v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Franklin v. City of MillvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  3. Woodward v. HardenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albanese v. IndelicatoUnited States District Court · 1947
  2. Mandelbaum v. WeissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API