Legal Opinion
United States v. Ryan Dale Oetken
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 28, 2001No. 00-2929PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Ryan Dale Oetken was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The government maintained at sentencing that Mr. Oetken’s base offense level should have been increased from 14, see U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(6)(A), to 20, see § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A), to reflect a burglary conviction that he received after he had committed the instant offense. The sentencing guidelines establish a base offense level of 20 if the defendant “had one prior felony conviction ... [for] a crime of violence,” see § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). Mr. Oetken…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Joseph Vincent HuntCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Derek Pedragh, Also Known as Derrick Pedraja, Also Known as Derik Pedraja, Also Known as Derek PedrajaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Michael Lynn BartonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States of America, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. Tommy Blake McCary Defendant/appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Dustin John HiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Cofske v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Santonio ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.