Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Buza

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided December 16, 1994No. A-5091Published

1DissentCoats, Judge

Sentencing is primarily a function of the trial court. Trial judges have considerable discretion in sentencing, particularly in sentencing a first felony offender, such as Buza, who had no prior criminal record and a significant history of positive accomplishments in his life. Given Buza’s prior history, Judge Hunt had discretion to treat him with leniency. On the other hand, Buza’s crime was a serious class B felony. Buza embezzled approximately $100,000 from his employer, engaging in numerous separate thefts over a lengthy period of time.

This court has upheld as not clearly mistaken…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brezenoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  2. State v. KarnosCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API