Legal Opinion
Beets v. Padgett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 3, 1970No. 45720PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
1. The plaintiff brought an action to recover a real estate commission which he alleged was due him by his employer who was a real estate broker. While there was evidence that the plaintiff was employed as a real estate salesman, the record fails to show that he had obtained a license as required by Code § 84-1410. It was a condition precedent to recovery that the plaintiff prove he had the necessary license and the failure to do so requires the grant of a new trial. Code Ann. § 84-1413. See Maxwell v. Tucker, 118 Ga. App. 695, 698 (165 SE2d 459); Household Finance Corp. v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maxwell v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Household Finance Corporation v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Dixon v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mathews v. GreinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- White v. Watson Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Georgia Central Credit Union v. WeemsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Beets v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Atlanta Apartment Investments, Inc. v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.