Biggers v. State

Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was found guilty on three indictments charging him with various firearm violations. On this appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence, in admitting certain evidence, in denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal, and in two aspects of the charge to the jury. Our review of the law and of the record reveals no reversible error.

1. Appellant argues that the evidence seized at the time of his arrest should have been suppressed because his arrest was illegal and, even if the arrest was legal, the search…