Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty., No. Jv-508801

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 25, 1995No. 1 CA-JV 94-0063, 1 CA-JV 94-0081 and 1 CA-JV 95-0010Published

1DissentLankford, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent from the opinion that the juvenile court lacks the authority to require DNA testing as a condition of probation.

The majority’s reasoning is straightforward enough. Noting that the Arizona Legislature has required DNA testing of adults and HIV testing of juveniles, the majority argues that the legislature could not have intended to allow DNA testing of juveniles because the legislature did not expressly authorize it.

The principal difficulty with the majority’s argument is this: The fact that the legislature has not required testing does not mean that testing is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-128676Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-20705-3Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. State v. SUPERIOR COURT, NAVAJO COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty. Juv. ActionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API