Legal Opinion
Vaughn v. Chrysler Corporation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 30, 1974No. Civ. A. 4-71262, 4-71263PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS
KAESS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs’ complaints read in the most favorable light, each set forth the same three claims: violation of a property or contract right, denial of due process, and age discrimination. Each defendant has brought a Motion to Dismiss, and defendant Chrysler Corporation brings, in the alternative, a Motion for Summary Judgment. Because of the almost identical wording of the complaints and the motions seeking their dismissal, these two cases have been consolidated for purposes of this Opinion and Order.
The claimed violation of a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Sandra J. DREW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Virginia L. GOGER, Appellant, v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Burgett v. Cudahy CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Anne M. DARTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Skoglund v. Singer CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1975
- Carl W. EKLUND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the LUBRIZOL CORP. Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Bertrand v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.