Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Mutual Benefit Health & Acc. Ass'n
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 16, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This is a motion for summary judgment. The action was commenced in the City Court of the City of New York, and removed to this Court by the defendant. .
It appears from the papers submitted on the motion that the following material facts exist without substantial controversy :
1. On or about March 19, 1943, the defendant (hereinafter called the “insurance company”) issued to the late husband of the plaintiff a certain health and accident insurance policy, No. 101S-58581-43.
2. The policy provided benefits for loss of life, limb, sight or time by accidental means, or for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Morgan v. Greater New York Taxpayers Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Swift & Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Efthimi Thomas v. Mutual Benefit Health and Accident AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Datatab, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972