Legal Opinion

New York Asbestos Mfg. Co. v. Ambler Asbestos Air-Cell Covering Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1900No. 61PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This is a suit in equity for infringement of a trade-mark and for unfair competition. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

That either “air-cell” or “fire-board,” as used by the plaintiff, constitutes a valid trade-mark, is at least open to very serious doubt. The impression now made upon my mind is that those terms are descriptive of certain products; that they identify the manufactured articles with which they are associated, not the manufacturer thereof; and no more need be said upon the subject of trade-mark, separately considered, upon this motion. New York Asbestos Mfg. Co. v. New York Fireproof Covering Co. (Sup.) 62 N. Y. Supp. 339; Vitascope Co. v. U. S. Phonograph Co. (C. C.) 83…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lare v. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  2. Vitascope Co. v. United States Phonograph Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1897
  3. Van Camp Packing Co. v. Cruikshanks Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  4. New York Asbestos Manufacturing Co. v. New York Fireproof Covering Co.New York Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Asbestos Mfg. Co. v. Ambler Asbestos Air-Cell Covering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API