Legal Opinion

Juergens Bros. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1919No. 12882PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Writ oe Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscar M. Torrison, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

The circuit court of Cook county confirmed the award of the Industrial Commission. The record shows that the plaintiff in error and Fred Kaage, defendant in error, were on May 15, 1917, at the time of the accident; working under and subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation act as it existed at that time, and that the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment of Kaage. The average weekly wage of Kaage at the time of the accident was $21. There is no claim for medical, surgical or hospital services, and all payments for the period of temporary total incapacity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Mark Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Claim of Frings v. Pierce Arrow Motor Car Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. Otis Elevator Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kelley v. ProutyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Jewel Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Faber v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Lambert v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Noble, Etc. v. ZimmermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API