Spence v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentSchwartz, Senior Judge
Although the majority is quite correct in indicating that there is evidence which supports the determination below, I believe, after careful consideration of the record and the oral arguments of the parties, that the testimony of the employer’s witness is unworthy of belief and that the result in this case therefore effects a manifest injustice to which I cannot in conscience agree. See Fla. Nat’l Bank v. Sherouse, 80 Fla. 405, 86 So. 279 (1920); Newman v. Smith, 77 Fla. 633, 82 So. 236 (1918); Progressive Express Ins. Co. v. Schultz, 948 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Star-Rite Indus., Inc.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Newman v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Florida National Bank v. SherouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Ziontz v. Ocean Trail Unit Owners Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Progressive Exp. Ins. Co. v. SchultzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Sta-Rite Industries, Inc. v. LeveyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.