Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Francis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.

Suit under the statute providing for compensation to the owners of animals killed or injured by railroads, brought by the appellee, against the appellant, before a justice of the peace, for killing a cow.

*390Judgment for the appellee before the justice; appeal hy the appellant to the circuit court; judgment in the circuit court for appellee; appeal hy the appellant to this court.

The case is prepared upon the evidence, the sufficiency of which to sustain the finding is the only question before us; and the only objection made to the sufficiency of the evidence is, that it shows, that, at the place…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wabash Railway Co. v. ForsheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ShanklinIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Croy v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API