Legal Opinion
State v. Provet
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided January 31, 2011No. 4787PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
On appeal, Karriem Provet (Provet) argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence resulting from a traffic stop because the police subjected him to an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. We affirm.
FACTS
On the night of May 1, 2002, Corporal John Owens (Owens) of the South Carolina Highway Patrol was patrolling on Interstate 85 in Greenville County, South Carolina, when he observed a 1997 Ford Expedition (the vehicle). The vehicle had a burned out tag light and was following another vehicle too closely. Subsequently, Owens commenced…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ProvetSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- State v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.