Legal Opinion
People v. Dugan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 25, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant’s conviction of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree is based on legally sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We further *923conclude that County Court properly admitted evidence that, during his first trial, defendant absconded during jury deliberations. That conduct was indicative of a consciousness of guilt and the court properly instructed the jury concerning the weakness of that flight evidence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. YazumNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. BurtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. KinsellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019