Legal Opinion

Padron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 13, 2000No. 3D00-363Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from an order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief brought pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. We reverse. See State v. Mancino, 705 So.2d 1379 (Fla.1998) (holding in part that despite his plea agreement, defendant’s postconviction allegation that he never actually possessed the firearm during the crime required a factual determination in an evidentiary hearing); Flores v. State, 745 So.2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Reversed and remanded for an eviden-tiary hearing.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. Flores v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999