People v. Munguia
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
INTRODUCTION
Codefendants Elissa Arambula, Jose Luis Munguia and Anesia Lucia Ribeiro were charged by amended information with first degree burglary with the intent to commit larceny or any felony, in violation of Penal Code section 460, subdivision (a). 1 As to each defendant, the amended information alleged the offense was a serious felony under section 1192.7, subdivision (c)(18), and a violent felony within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (c)(21). As to Munguia, the amended information also alleged he committed the offense while out on bail within the meaning of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. VillalobosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Saddozai CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2021