Cheema v. Thompson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge HALL; Dissent by Judge WIGGINS.
ORDER
The order filed August 1, 1995, is hereby withdrawn and the opinion below filed in its stead.
OPINION
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Livingston Union School District (the “school district”) appeal the district court’s preliminary injunction ordering them to accommodate three schoolchildren’s religious practices until this dispute under the Religious Freedoms Restoration Act of 1993 (“RFRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb et seq., can be litigated on the merits.
The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. We have…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Senate of California v. MosbacherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Ministry of Defense of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Gould, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3Cited by29 opinions
- Pankaj Karan Singh Kataria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BauerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Diaz v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.